<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Encephalosponge &#187; windows alternatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://encephalosponge.com/tag/windows-alternatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://encephalosponge.com</link>
	<description>Soaking Up Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:26:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://encephalosponge.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7: Netbook killer</title>
		<link>http://encephalosponge.com/2009/04/22/windows-7-netbook-killer/</link>
		<comments>http://encephalosponge.com/2009/04/22/windows-7-netbook-killer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 04:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Blackhall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows alternatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://encephalosponge.com/?p=710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is a prediction of things to come in the next year. I get the feeling that Microsoft is trying to kill the netbook market with Windows 7. In case you haven&#8217;t heard, Microsoft announced a new edition of &#8230; <a href="http://encephalosponge.com/2009/04/22/windows-7-netbook-killer/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following is a prediction of things to come in the next year.</p>
<p>I get the feeling that Microsoft is trying to kill the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netbook">netbook</a> market with Windows 7.  In case you haven&#8217;t heard, Microsoft announced a <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=844">new edition of Windows 7: Starter Edition</a>.  The Starter Edition is only capable of running 3 applications at once.  Their purpose for this &#8220;Starter Edition&#8221; is two-fold.  First, it is meant to be a sufficiently crippled version of Windows 7 so that they can sell it dirt cheap for use in netbooks.  Many people will not buy it <del datetime="2009-10-22T04:25:40+00:00">because it can only run 3 programs at a time.</del> (Update: MS changed their minds on this after significant blacklash from the community, but Starter continues to have other strict limitations)  They&#8217;ll pay a <em>significant</em> premium to buy a netbook containing a &#8220;normal&#8221; version of Windows 7 (Basic or Home) because it will be Microsoft&#8217;s flagship operating system.  That&#8217;s different from today&#8217;s market.  Microsoft can afford to give away Windows XP for dirt cheap on current iterations of netbooks because it&#8217;s already really old, and they&#8217;re busy trying to sell Vista.  Buying a netbook with Windows 7 Basic or Home will increase the total cost so much that the devices will no longer be &#8220;worth it&#8221; to people unless they <em>really</em> want that small form-factor ultra-ultra-portable.  </p>
<p>Second, most of the people silly enough to purchase the Starter Edition will find it so incredibly annoying to use that they will either have to pay to upgrade to a non-crippled version of Windows (again significantly increasing overall cost of the device) or they will discount their netbook as &#8220;a toy&#8221; of little value.  This attempt by Microsoft to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upsell">upsell</a> the netbook market is probably going to kill it.  Any way you slice it, Microsoft-based consumer interest in the market will wane.</p>
<p>Then, of course, we have Linux-based netbooks.  By October, <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu</a> 9.10 will be available.  It will likely boot on your netbook in 15 seconds or less if it has an <abbr title="Solid State Drive">SSD</abbr>.  It will come fully featured with an office suite, IM client, email client, web browser, media player, image editor, and much, much more.  Oh, and you&#8217;ll be able to run <em>every single</em> application at once if you want to.  Graphics will be performing fantastically, and the user interface will be strikingly refreshing.  And of course you&#8217;ll get all of this for the low, low price of $0.  Let&#8217;s just hope that <a href="http://www.canonical.com">Canonical</a> can get it installed on a number of prominent netbooks whose manufacturers won&#8217;t hide it behind a curtain so that consumers will realize that they&#8217;re no longer subject to Microsoft&#8217;s crippleware.  They can have an extraordinarily functional, free system on any machine they want.  Ubuntu needs to capitalize on Microsoft&#8217;s idiotic move here, and I think they will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://encephalosponge.com/2009/04/22/windows-7-netbook-killer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The shoe&#8217;s on the other foot</title>
		<link>http://encephalosponge.com/2008/01/08/the-shoes-on-the-other-foot/</link>
		<comments>http://encephalosponge.com/2008/01/08/the-shoes-on-the-other-foot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Blackhall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attention Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[g33k]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gnu-linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows alternatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://encephalosponge.com/2008/01/08/the-shoes-on-the-other-foot/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read an interesting review article of Microsoft Windows. Alternatives to Windows (like Mac OSX and various builds of GNU/Linux) often get a bad rap because they are inevitably looked at through the eyes of a Windows user. This &#8230; <a href="http://encephalosponge.com/2008/01/08/the-shoes-on-the-other-foot/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read an <a href="http://truefire.wordpress.com/2007/10/06/hello-world/">interesting review article</a> of Microsoft Windows.  Alternatives to Windows (like Mac OSX and various builds of GNU/Linux) often get a bad rap because they are inevitably looked at through the eyes of a Windows user.  This article attempts to put the shoe on the other foot by looking at Windows through the eyes of a Linux user (but don&#8217;t worry, it&#8217;s not overly-technical).  <a href="http://ifacethoughts.net/2007/12/30/testing-windows-with-linux-eyes/">Another article</a> points out that it&#8217;s unfair to do a feature-to-feature comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://encephalosponge.com/2008/01/08/the-shoes-on-the-other-foot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

