<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Blu-ray pull through?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://encephalosponge.com/2008/09/22/will-blu-ray-pull-through/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://encephalosponge.com/2008/09/22/will-blu-ray-pull-through/</link>
	<description>Soaking Up Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:37:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiyoshi Martinez</title>
		<link>http://encephalosponge.com/2008/09/22/will-blu-ray-pull-through/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiyoshi Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 05:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://encephalosponge.com/?p=310#comment-154</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t plan on upgrading to Blu-Ray anytime soon. As you&#039;ve stated, the prices are just too high and I don&#039;t have a HDTV. Also, I have a large DVD collection already and hate the thought of paying 2-4x what I paid originally for the DVD. 

While I plan on upgrading to HDTV in the near future, that purchase alone will set me back from wanting to get Blu-Ray. I&#039;d be more interested in getting HD cable TV and a higher-capcity DVR. 

What really needs to stop is the absurdly high price of Blu-Ray titles, that&#039;s keeping people from switching over. I can see people springing for a Blu-Ray player (after all, why not get a PS3, too?) but $40 for a movie? Meanwhile, I glance over and see 4 titles I can buy for $10 each (or less!) and get more value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t plan on upgrading to Blu-Ray anytime soon. As you&#8217;ve stated, the prices are just too high and I don&#8217;t have a HDTV. Also, I have a large DVD collection already and hate the thought of paying 2-4x what I paid originally for the DVD. </p>
<p>While I plan on upgrading to HDTV in the near future, that purchase alone will set me back from wanting to get Blu-Ray. I&#8217;d be more interested in getting HD cable TV and a higher-capcity DVR. </p>
<p>What really needs to stop is the absurdly high price of Blu-Ray titles, that&#8217;s keeping people from switching over. I can see people springing for a Blu-Ray player (after all, why not get a PS3, too?) but $40 for a movie? Meanwhile, I glance over and see 4 titles I can buy for $10 each (or less!) and get more value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Usama</title>
		<link>http://encephalosponge.com/2008/09/22/will-blu-ray-pull-through/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Usama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://encephalosponge.com/?p=310#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Found it: it was actually Samsung and they predicted Blu-Ray &lt;a href=&quot;http://gizmodo.com/5044894/samsung-blu+ray-will-be-dead-in-five-years&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;would be dead in 5 years&lt;/a&gt;. But I was wrong, it wasn&#039;t another format, it was a digital download sort of thing.

That&#039;s too bad, I really wanted Firefly in high-def.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found it: it was actually Samsung and they predicted Blu-Ray <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5044894/samsung-blu+ray-will-be-dead-in-five-years" rel="nofollow">would be dead in 5 years</a>. But I was wrong, it wasn&#8217;t another format, it was a digital download sort of thing.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s too bad, I really wanted Firefly in high-def.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Usama</title>
		<link>http://encephalosponge.com/2008/09/22/will-blu-ray-pull-through/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Usama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://encephalosponge.com/?p=310#comment-152</guid>
		<description>I think the quality of the video is significantly better than DVD, but you need a high-def TV that&#039;s larger than 40&quot; to really understand how much better it is.

But yes: DRM, expensive war w/ HD-DVD and thus delay in dropping prices on Blu-Ray players and movies, confusing specs which are prohibitive towards buying any player except the PS3, and most people don&#039;t have TVs that can really take advantage of the higher definition are all reasons why it&#039;s struggling.

Most people think Blu-Ray won&#039;t last long enough and that digital distribution will beat it. I also read someone is coming out with yet another format that is actually better than Blu-Ray (not just in quality, but in price and all that). I forget where I read that but I&#039;ll post it here when I find it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the quality of the video is significantly better than DVD, but you need a high-def TV that&#8217;s larger than 40&#8243; to really understand how much better it is.</p>
<p>But yes: DRM, expensive war w/ HD-DVD and thus delay in dropping prices on Blu-Ray players and movies, confusing specs which are prohibitive towards buying any player except the PS3, and most people don&#8217;t have TVs that can really take advantage of the higher definition are all reasons why it&#8217;s struggling.</p>
<p>Most people think Blu-Ray won&#8217;t last long enough and that digital distribution will beat it. I also read someone is coming out with yet another format that is actually better than Blu-Ray (not just in quality, but in price and all that). I forget where I read that but I&#8217;ll post it here when I find it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

